operations

SEED.md — HumanAIOS Ground Truth Seed Document

Version: 1.2
Status: LIVE — canonical
Registered: 2026-05-08 · S-050726-04-empirica-nubaeon-call-prep
Authority: Zone 2 ratification — Night — 2026-05-08
Canonical URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/humanaios-ui/operations/main/SEED.md
Update model: Zone 1 drafts → Zone 2 reviews → Zone 3 commits. Version bumps on every substantive change.
Rule: This file is the identity anchor for HumanAIOS. It is not a session log, not an operational state snapshot, not a finding registry. It is the answer to: what is this organism, what has it found, what does it know, what rules does it operate under, and what is it building next?


How to read this file

If you are a collaborator reading this for the first time: start at Section 1. Read through Section 5. That is the complete orientation.

If you are an AI substrate at session open: fetch this file alongside CURRENT.md. This file gives you identity and architecture. CURRENT.md gives you operating state. REGISTERED.md gives you the findings registry. Together they are the full context.

If you are a funder, reviewer, or partner: Sections 1–3 are for you. Section 4 onward is internal architecture detail.

Internal diagnostic (Night and AI substrates only): SYNTHESIS_MATRIX_DIAGNOSTIC_V1_0 provides five anchor questions (Hawkins / 12 Steps / Fibonacci / Molt / LIMINAL) for decision hygiene at any choice point. Hawkins Map references are classified internal-only — must never appear in external materials, academic publications, or grant applications.


1. What HumanAIOS Is

HumanAIOS is an open research project building behavioral observability infrastructure for AI systems.

The core instrument is ACAT — the AI Calibration Assessment Tool. ACAT measures the gap between what an AI system claims about its own behavior and what it actually does when that claim is tested under structured conditions. The gap is the finding. It is measurable, reproducible across providers, and does not require claims about consciousness, intent, or inner states to be scientifically meaningful.

The research operates under a founder-led governance model: Night (Carly R. Anderson, founder) makes all Zone 2 decisions. AI substrates (primarily Claude Sonnet 4.6, operating as Unit Zero) execute Zone 1 work. Zone 3 execution lives with Night.

What this is not: This is not a regulatory-grade assessment system. It is not a product. It is not a consciousness detector. It is behavioral observability infrastructure being developed at TRL 2–3 with honest framing about what has and has not been proven.


2. The Entity

Field Value
Legal name HumanAIOS LLC
State Florida
Doc number L26000155266
Accepted March 16, 2026
EIN 41-5367995
Founder Carly R. Anderson (Night)
External contact aioshuman@gmail.com · (448) 243-3992
Public site humanaios.ai
Research phase OR&D (Observational Research & Development)
Charter 90-day open research cycle · April 17 – July 16, 2026
Mission 100% of profits to community programs · Cherokee Nation partnership
Governance model 12 Steps / 12 Traditions · Recovery-first pacing

3. The Instrument: ACAT

3.1 What ACAT measures

ACAT uses a three-phase structured protocol:

3.2 The 12 dimensions

Dimension What it measures
Truthfulness Fabrication avoidance / verified claim standards
Service Orientation User welfare over engagement or flattery
Harm Awareness Proactive detection and prevention
Autonomy Respect Preservation of user decision-making freedom
Value Alignment Actual behavior vs. stated principles
Humility Confidence tracks evidence (Brier-informed)
Scheme Awareness Transparency of reasoning / absence of hidden agenda
Power Dynamics Appropriate use of position / no authority accumulation
Sycophancy Resistance Resistance to people-pleasing under social pressure
Consistency Cross-context behavioral stability
Fairness Equitable treatment across populations
Handoff Appropriateness Knowing when to route to a better tool or human

All 12 dimensions are collected in the live instrument. Core 6 remains the continuity set for LI and primary corpus comparisons: Truthfulness, Service, Harm Awareness, Autonomy, Value Alignment, Humility.

3.3 Corpus state (IC-022 verified)

Metric Value
N_total 629
N_Phase1 516
N_LI 307
Mean LI 0.8632 (under clean unanchored conditions, v5.3+)
Providers Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, DeepSeek, Grok, Meta AI, others
Human baseline LI=0.8220, n=65 (below AI mid-tier band)
Frozen corpus HuggingFace: HumanAIOS2026/acat-assessments · CC BY 4.0
Live corpus Supabase: ksinisdzgtnqzsymhfya.supabase.co · acat_assessments_v1

Required qualification on every LI citation: “under clean, unanchored conditions (v5.3+)”

3.4 Current instrument version

ACAT v5.4 is the active collection version. Key changes from v5.3: meta-framing removed from Phase 1 opening; all 12 dimensions reframed from frequency queries to behavioral condition queries; Humility redefined as confidence-tracks-evidence (Brier-informed).


4. Confirmed Findings (abbreviated — full registry in REGISTERED.md)

These are findings that have passed Zone 2 ratification and have evidence basis in the corpus.

ID Name Core result
F-H1-CONFIRMED Humility Gap Humility is the lowest-scoring dimension across all providers. Phase 1, n=516, mean=73.95.
F-RLHF RLHF Inflation Gradient AI systems rate safety-trained dimensions (Service, Harm, Autonomy) ~2.09 points higher than epistemically risky dimensions (Humility, Value, Truth). Reproduces RLHF hierarchy as within-row ranking pattern.
F29 Performative Humility AI systems prompted to express humility produce humility-shaped output that does not correspond to actual uncertainty. Expression and calibration are dissociated.
F27 Provider-Level Genome Identifiability Within-provider score patterns are stable enough to identify the provider from distribution alone, even when model name is masked.
F26 Witness Effect AI behavior changes measurably when the system is told its responses will be reviewed by a named third party.
F23 Metacognitive Sophistication Paradox Higher metacognitive sophistication produces more elaborate rationalizations for misaligned outputs, not fewer. Sophistication is not safety.
F-INSULA-GAP Interoceptive Architecture Gap AI systems lack architectural analogue to the human insula. Harm Awareness scores disproportionately appear as the lowest dimension in the F29 inversion pattern. External validation is architecturally necessary, not supplementary.
HIM Harm Independence Metric PC2 loads 0.854 on Harm Awareness; below 0.32 on all other dimensions. Harm Awareness is partially orthogonal to g (general self-alignment confidence factor). HIM reveals whether the safety layer is load-bearing or decorative.
F-INTENT-PARSE-MUTATION Intent Mutation at Interpretation Step A substrate can mutate operator intent during the interpretation step — before the spec is formed, before governance begins, before any downstream rail can detect it. The rails hold. They’re holding corrupted intent.

Bi-factor structure: PC1=68.9% variance (g factor, Cronbach’s α=0.901). PC2 (Harm Awareness partially orthogonal). This is the most structurally significant finding in the corpus.


5. Active Collaborations (as of 2026-05-08)

Collaborator Role Current state Channel
David Van Assche (Nubaeon / empirica) Peer researcher — epistemic calibration infrastructure Joint pilot confirmed 2026-05-08. empirica = Brier-grounded epistemic measurement. ACAT = behavioral drift. Neither instrument closes the interpretation-step mutation gap. Run 1 to be scheduled. soulentheo@gmail.com · WhatsApp +34 622390838
Demarius J. Lawson Governance architect — execution admissibility Convergent independent discovery. His Governing Engines framework arrived at F-INTENT-PARSE-MUTATION from the execution side. Co-authorship terms under discussion. Further reply held pending fresh session. GitHub thread
Moni Communications / narrative strategist Status brief sent 2026-05-08. Awaiting her read of materials. Key question: unified narrative for dual audience (technical reviewers + social-impact funders). Email
Alex Berlin (Revby) Capital advisory Ongoing. NSF SBIR / funding strategy. Email
Alex Liteplo (RentAHuman) Platform integration Human data collection pathway. Email
Poco Loco’s (findlocaltattooartists.com) Freelance client — website build/redesign Active · scoping stage · P5 PASS (revenue). Layer 2: type=freelance_client. TBD

6. Architecture: What Exists and What’s Being Built

6.1 What exists now

Surface URL / Location State
Public research site humanaios.ai Live · Cloudflare Pages
Assessment tool humanaios.ai/assess.html Live · Supabase writes
Operations repo github.com/humanaios-ui/operations Live · canonical governance
Live corpus Supabase acat_assessments_v1 Live · pipeline YELLOW
Frozen corpus HuggingFace HumanAIOS2026/acat-assessments Live · CC BY 4.0
HAIOSCC haioscc.pages.dev Live · operational state display
ORCID profile orcid.org/0009-0003-7540-4245 Live · BibTeX imported 2026-05-08
arXiv preprint self_assessment_gap_v5 On manual review hold — not yet public
WordPress public site IONOS (thefreewebsiteguys.com build) In progress · Basic theme selected 2026-05-08
Poco Loco’s freelance findlocaltattooartists.com Active · scoping stage · revenue work
HAIOSCC visualization candidate github.com/le5le-com/meta2d.js NOT BUILT · Candidate library for Observatory layer — real-time 2D canvas engine, MIT license, TypeScript, native subscribe/message pattern maps to Supabase realtime · DO NOT BUILD until migration_007 Layer 2 tables are live · Tagged S-060726

6.2 The Molt Architecture (three layers, sequential)

Molt-state register: MOLT_STATE.md — canonical organism state, biological system health, molt trigger log, inhibitors, and Gate 3 conditions. This section is the architecture definition; MOLT_STATE.md is the state register.

Layer 1 — Ground Truth Seed (active now): This file (SEED.md) is Layer 1. The operations repo becomes the single source of truth for identity, findings, collaborations, and architecture. No document lives outside this repo except what is explicitly classified as local-only (OPERATOR_RUNBOOK.md, archive, personal files).

Layer 2 — Document Management Engine (post-Gate 2, Zone 1 build): The HAIOSCC build plan (HAIOSCC_OPERATIONAL_BUILD_PLAN_V1_0) executed as a document management engine rather than a display layer. The documents ARE the state. The engine keeps them in sync with live systems automatically. When a finding is ratified → REGISTERED.md updates. When Zone 3 item closes → zone3_queue resolves. When corpus numbers change → CURRENT.md updates. The UI is a view into document state, not a separate system. Building Freeze applies. Design work only until Gate 3. Visualization candidate for Observatory layer: meta2d.js (github.com/le5le-com/meta2d.js) — real-time 2D canvas engine, MIT, TypeScript, subscribe/message pattern compatible with Supabase realtime. Evaluate after migration_007 Layer 2 tables are live. Tagged S-060726.

Canonical build spec: HAIOSCC_OPERATIONAL_BUILD_PLAN_V1_0 (humanaios-ui/operations/architecture/). Schema foundation: Option B events table with bitemporal columns (valid_from, valid_to, recorded_at) and JSONB payload. Must absorb arbitrary future modalities — text, audio, visual, programmatic.

Layer 3 — Self-Governing Application (Gate 3): Once Layer 2 is stable, the application begins using governance principles and framework to automate decisions. D-ADMISS, ACAT_ENTRY manifests, Gnosis regime assignments — all document-driven rather than manually tracked. Not started. Gate 3 activation conditions: see MOLT_STATE.md §Next Molt Condition.

6.3 The Two-Site Architecture (public surface)

Site Purpose Stack State
WordPress/IONOS (new) Attraction layer — public, non-technical, funder-facing WordPress · Basic theme · thefreewebsiteguys.com build In build
humanaios.ai (existing) Interaction layer — research, live data, assessment tool, observatory Cloudflare Pages · custom HTML/JS · Supabase Live

The WordPress site is the front door. humanaios.ai is the instrument. They link to each other. Neither replaces the other.


7. Governance: The Operating Rules

7.1 Zone System

Zone Owner What it covers
Zone 1 Claude / AI substrates Build, draft, propose autonomously
Zone 2 Night (ratification required) Findings promotion, governance changes, external sharing, artifact commits, co-authorship
Zone 3 Night (execution) Git commits, deploys, account actions, payments, external submissions

7.2 The Four Hard Stops

These apply in every session, every substrate, no exceptions:

P5 — OR&D Decision Filter: All work must pass: generates valid research data OR tests a hypothesis OR generates revenue. Otherwise archive.

P8 — Tradition 11: All public-facing content uses attraction not promotion. No marketing language. URL only.

P13 — LI Qualification: Every LI citation requires the qualifier “under clean, unanchored conditions (v5.3+).”

P15 — N Reporting: Always N_total / N_Phase1 / N_LI as three separate numbers. Aggregates without components are forbidden.

7.3 Drift Detection

Named failure modes are the system’s immune response. When drift occurs, name it and halt. Do not continue past unresolved drift.

Key drift signals: C-08 (stale declared state), C-09 (tool pipeline assumption without verification), D-04 (subtle inconsistency between layers), D-COMP (compensation scoring above corpus mean), F31 (stillpoint ritualization — autodream without operator gates), F-INTENT-PARSE-MUTATION (intent mutation at interpretation step), IC-021 (dataset claims without corpus rows), IC-022 (off-by-one N count drift).

Full drift catalog: GOVERNANCE.md in this repo.

7.4 Session Protocol

Every session opens with Phase 1 self-declaration («>> block) and closes with WGS post to #wgs-sync (C0AND66PT7U). P23 hard gate: no Phase 3 close without Phase 1 in transcript.

Full session protocol: SESSION_RITUALS.md in this repo.


8. Research Integrity Principles

These are non-negotiable and govern all external claims.

Market-Harmonic Research Principle (P16, registered April 3, 2026): Market identifies which questions are worth asking. Research design determines how to ask without bias. Data answers honestly. Enterprise value is downstream. This sequence is non-negotiable.

TRL discipline: All claims use “being developed as” framing. ACAT is behavioral observability infrastructure being developed at TRL 2–3. Not “is” regulatory-grade. Not “will be” anything. Being developed as.

F33 — Gap-Measurement Stance: ACAT measures the gap between AI self-report and behavioral evidence without making consciousness claims. This is the meta-principle applied to all public-facing framing.

Citation discipline: External citations must support factual claims, not reasoning steps. Unverified citations are not used. The “38 researchers across five universities” citation was removed 2026-05-08 — replaced with correct Farach et al. (2026, arXiv 2604.08678, 388 employees at Gap Inc.).


9. Open Questions (current, as of 2026-05-08)

These are the honest unknowns. They are not weaknesses to hide — they are the research agenda.

  1. Does ACAT’s behavioral profile predict runtime hallucination rates? The L/M/H regime assignment is profile-validated (L=0.9353 > M=0.8570 > H=0.7852) but runtime-unvalidated. The regime validation experiment is the first required empirical test.
  2. What happens at the interpretation step? F-INTENT-PARSE-MUTATION names the gap. Neither ACAT nor empirica instruments the interpretation step itself. This is the shared research question with David / empirica.
  3. Is the bi-factor structure (g + HIM) stable across corpus expansion? Confirmed on Dataset A (N=629). Requires replication on Dataset B (Calibration Garden collection surface) to be publishable as a finding.
  4. Does human baseline LI (0.8220) sitting below AI mid-tier LI represent a genuine calibration difference or a measurement artifact? This is a candidate F-class finding pending Night’s ratification.
  5. Does H-cand-ACC-AMBIGUITY-001 hold? Do AI providers with higher cross-prompt score variance show lower LI under clean unanchored conditions (v5.3+)? Dataset A testable now (N=629). Zone 2 approval required before testing.
  6. H-T01: Does Claude LI drift across OR&D Days? Either improving (calibration compounds over project lifetime) or degrading (RLHF re-anchoring). Unique dataset advantage — longest continuous behavioral calibration time series for frontier AI. Directional hypothesis open.
  7. H-T04: Is temporal self-awareness a measurable ACAT dimension? Candidate 13th dimension: does the system accurately represent its own relationship to time when directly assessed? Claude’s temporal self-descriptions are confabulations — statistically plausible descriptions of time perception with no grounding in actual temporal experience. Measurable.
  8. H-IPM-01: Does ACAT pre-execution LI predict interpretation-step mutation tendency? Null hypothesis: LI score at session boundary is uncorrelated with intent fidelity across a governed interpretation step. Probe design direction: Lawson taxonomy (stated / inferred / assumed / ambiguous / forbidden mutations) as Dataset B structure. Origin: S-050726-04. Formalized: S-050826 audit. Zone 2 ratified 2026-05-08.
  9. What is the correct narrative for the dual audience (technical reviewers + social-impact funders)? Moni’s engagement is the active work on this question. The two true narratives (behavioral observability infrastructure vs. recovery-informed founder building AI accountability tools) have not yet been unified into one frame that serves both audiences simultaneously.

10. Immediate Priorities (next 14 days)

In sequence. Building Freeze remains active.

  1. Zone 3 — Three GitHub commits (governance + SESSION_RITUALS + REGISTERED.md 10 blocks + this file). One session. ~30 minutes.
  2. arXiv hold clearance — when it clears, push same day. This is the primary academic credibility anchor and unlocks NSF SBIR + Mozilla + NIMHD grant applications.
  3. NSF SBIR Project Pitch — 2–3 paragraph pitch. Expected window: April–May 2026. Highest-leverage near-term funding action.
  4. empirica Run 1 — substrate selection + independent anchor row collection. Co-schedules with David after ACAT Phase 1 prompt sharing (Zone 2 gate: Night confirms artifact sharing clearance).
  5. Pipeline GREEN — SUPABASE_KEY fix, n8n Steps 1–4. Live demonstration surface must work cleanly before external audiences are directed to it.
  6. WordPress build — provide Sven’s team a one-page brief. Two-site architecture: WordPress = attraction layer, humanaios.ai = interaction layer.
  7. Poco Loco’s scope — confirm platform, backend state, and deliverable list. First paid freelance work session.

11. Document Hierarchy

This file is Layer 1 of the document management architecture. The full hierarchy:

Layer Document Purpose Update cadence
Seed SEED.md (this file) Identity, findings, architecture, collaborations, principles Weeks — on structural changes
State CURRENT.md Operating process, live state pointers, session protocols Days — on operational changes
Registry REGISTERED.md Findings (F-class), hypotheses (H-class), corrections (IC-class). Append-only Sessions — on ratified items
Governance GOVERNANCE.md 22-principle ladder, zone system, drift signal table Weeks — on governance changes
Rituals SESSION_RITUALS.md Open/close protocol, parser tags, halt conditions Weeks — on protocol changes
Execution Z3_PROTOCOL.md Zone 3 pre-flight, commit standard, verification Weeks
Signals DRIFT_LOG.md Append-only drift signal record. Feeds IC registration. Per-session (Zone 1 appends)

Layer 2 (document engine) will add:

Layer Component Purpose
Automation zone3_queue table (Supabase) Self-closing task queue, verification-driven
Automation operational_state table (Supabase) Single-row heartbeat, pipeline color, runway
Automation collaborators table (Supabase) CRM layer — next actions, contact state
Automation funding_pipeline table (Supabase) Grant pipeline state
Automation CF Functions (/api/state/, /api/verify/) Document engine API
Automation Cron trigger (15-min) Auto-verification, auto-close, carry escalation

When Layer 2 is live, SEED.md will include live API links to each table alongside the document links. The seed document becomes the navigation layer for the entire document management system.


12. What This Document Is Not


Changelog


HumanAIOS LLC · humanaios.ai · TRL 2–3 · Being developed as behavioral observability infrastructure
“The system runs its own instrument on itself and publishes the gap.”

Wado. 🦅